Replies to post #30216 on Jesus__Man, God, Alien

[JJL]

lol!

[chloebware]

It's called a preemptive strike

A preemptive strike is a military action which is designed to neutralize a potential threat, or to gain a distinct advantage against an enemy. The legality of preemptive strikes is questionable, as they are generally considered offensive actions except in very specific circumstances. For example, a preemptive strike against troops massing near a nation's border might be considered justified, while a random airstrike on a known enemy might not be legally acceptable. Despite debates over the legality of such actions, many nations throughout history have used preemptive attacks as military tools.

When a preemptive strike is considered, several things are usually incorporated into the decision. The first is a careful examination of the nature of the threat, with concrete threats like troop buildups or detonations of nuclear devices being considered justifications for preemptive attacks. Analysts also think about the likelihood of an anticipated attack from an enemy, weighing things like public announcements, intelligence information, and historical activities by the enemy.

Generally, governments are also encouraged to consider alternatives before moving on to a preemptive strike. When weighing the decision to make such a strike, government officials look at other options like diplomacy, sanctions, and other tools. Ideally, an aggressive action should only be undertaken if all other options have been exhausted. Finally, analysts may consider legal and ethical justifications for such a strike, to see if it conforms with the terms of the United Nations Charter.

[IxCimi]

A "preventative measure?" "Orkin Man"?

WOW! Really????

You've just betrayed ALL pretention of rightful action, wall. You just betrayed ALL you pretend to believe in.

If it is true that Vexari had not posted since the content of his last post 01/16/2013 01:22:22 AM then you choose the path of a fraud for all you claim to espouse; one who has allowed an anger from another board to guide you in a pathetic show of retribution and vendetta and let the innocuous "words" get the better of you and thereby showing the totality of an underlying weakness.

You may say I have "ego", but you just exposed the fragility of something even deeper rotting inside of you. Even while attempting to laugh it off to the public. And their complicity to NOT stand up to you for it, or even recognize this lack of character shows their mental weakness as well since they do not stand up for what is right, but rather than some idiotic comradery as if you were a Police force covering up the crimes of one of your own. What is collectively "convenient" for them is NOT to confront you on it and remain with what is agreeable, rather than "morally" acceptable.

You besmirch a man from personal intolerance. Yours.

Perhaps you will now conspire to ban me for calling you on the truth of this.

I doubt there is much of a chance in HELL you'll accept the truth of it as such.

I don't blame you. I would be seriously ashamed of both my action and my attempt to justify it too if I thought like this.

I'm sure you will not express any remorse, just further anger. And you will now make every effort to justify your every action, even those as yet uncomplete,... when you could simply move past it and undo your wrong.

On one hand, you'll become angrier, but weaker yet, on the other you'll offer acceptance and equinimity.

The crystal clarity of your MIND knows the truth of your action regardless of what your "ego" says or does.

And if your "friends" act FOR you, some friends they are...



A real friend tells a truth regardless of outcome.

Place your bets.