agree. been my mantra all along. design a trial so you know the ramifications of the design but the market doesn't and play the cards. By designing an underdog scenario you are basically increasing the power of the study. see post 111843. you don't know the outcome in advance but you would understand the significance of the results if bavi performed. seems like others have stakes in the game. the increased short interest is a clue. just interesting that you have the ceo and the former ceo running an investment fund (that worked with offshore clients i believe with other ventures). how convenient. it has always seemed like someone was in front of this train.