Had the post been read thoroughly, the reader would have seen I did not make a point, I made a counterpoint. There is a difference. As for us being back where we started, I would have to disagree with you. It seems as though your inquiry has narrowed in the reply from "IET nor anybody else in the world", to now just IET.
However, I do believe that some others have already countered that statement once or twice beforehand. I stated on the side of no plants fitting your criteria, and felt I countered your point nicely.
Whether or not there is an active plant fitting your description holds no relevance when all factors are taken into account. Being that all of the items consisting of WRT's have already been gasified separately and successfully is what does hold relevance. The next natural and logical step is to use WRT's, a combination of all aforementioned items, and profit from the combination.
If you are indeed a stockholder like me, then you should be just as excited as I am that GESI is breaking new ground in the field. Every scientific breakthrough usually comes with lots of news and coverage, and I'm glad to be able to soak them up before the stock explodes.
GESI/IFTF
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
