InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

iaguy52136

02/06/13 11:08 PM

#12863 RE: SAMadMoney #12862

So now u r thinking tomorrow wont amount to all the hype? Whats your opinion
icon url

Pure_Greatness

02/06/13 11:14 PM

#12865 RE: SAMadMoney #12862

Found this...

Federal question n. one basis for filing a lawsuit in federal district court is that it is based on subjects enumerated in the U. S. Constitution or when a federal statute is involved. Thus, existence of such federal question gives the federal court jurisdiction.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Federal+Question
icon url

1geb

02/07/13 7:25 AM

#12890 RE: SAMadMoney #12862

sam, this is NOT a new case...may hve been refiled...pls look @ the below from their 8K, 12/10/2012 @ 4:37PM
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=55395042
am i missing something

We and PlayBev intend to continue our suit against Playboy in Cook County, Illinois, alleging that Playboy breached, and that all defendants conspired to breach and aided and abetted Playboy’s breach, of the previous product license agreement and interfered with our established distributorship network. We seek compensatory and punitive damages, an injunction against termination of the previous product license and continuing interference, and other equitable and ancillary relief. Play Beverages, LLC, and CirTran Beverage Corp. v. Playboy Enterprises, Inc., et al., Case No. 2012L012181. Playboy and the other defendants have not responded to the lawsuit.