It's a requirement of otc that an attorney review company records, state who prepared them, list 5% stockholders, etc. as required in otc's requirements of "adequate disclosure".
Basically, SBRH can't get or maintain "current" rating without the company attorney providing this opinion letter.
The idea is to give legitimacy to company finanacials submitted to otc, so you (the potential investor) have confidence that you have all the information you need to make an intellegent and informed decision about the stock.
The reality is take all that with a big ol' block of salt lick.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
