InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Crow3

02/06/13 3:48 PM

#39341 RE: Crow3 #39340

I wonder if the new JUDGE that they now have in the BK court will want to re-visit some of those claims, like check progress against promises??

I rather doubt it. It is embarrassing enough w/o attracting any more attention.

Especially that part where JB got a BONUS for chousing the BOOLSHEET through the court, and getting the BK approved by the previous JUDGE.

Not a pretty thing to be in the annals of the court. It was as if the Court just wanted out of the affairs of CDEX.
icon url

d4diddy

02/06/13 6:08 PM

#39342 RE: Crow3 #39340

Their problem is that they market and sell products that are mere concepts. Take the iG4 for example, CDEx has claimed to have contracts for it before they've produced a single unit.

I don't believe they've produced even a single working prototype. The only mention of anything that works has come from an insider taut which absolutely cannot be taken seriously.

Loch/CDEx has always advertised product features and benefits that they don't have. In the case of the iG4, I don't beleve they'll ever produce one. That's why they're continuing to push the CCT's. And that's why over 5 weeks since they were suppose to delivery on their alleged contracts they still have nothing.