InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Chiron

02/05/13 12:26 PM

#12464 RE: TheFinalCD #12463

Absolutely. Why do you think Playboy tried to change the venue to California? It wasn't because they were confident in the current court, lol. They know they will probably lose, so they threw a hail mary pass to get it to Cali to a judge who would favor them. It didn't work, and now they have to face a jury. It's time for Playboy to just settle this ASAP.
icon url

Pure_Greatness

02/05/13 12:37 PM

#12466 RE: TheFinalCD #12463

They've already won TWICE against PlayBoy...

The most recent was this:
Play Beverages LLC, CirTran Beverage Corporation and CirTran Corporation (OTC BB: CIRC) announced today the U.S. District Court, Central District of California has ruled in their favor. The Court denied Playboy Enterprises International, Inc.’s (“Playboy”) motion for injunction and dismissed Playboy’s trademark lawsuit.


In the last PR the CEO stated the below

“We have been through nearly two years of legal actions, but now there are brighter skies on the horizon. Everyone at Play Beverages and CirTran is excited about getting back to business and regaining the momentum we worked so hard to build in expanding our beverage business and Playboy Energy Drink sales worldwide.”



http://m.yahoo.com/w/legobpengine/finance/news/play-beverages-cirtran-beverage-cirtran-135700398.html?.intl=us&.lang=en-us