Replies to post #4676 on Secure Point Technologies Inc (fka IMSCQ)

[insideoutsideupside]

My comment.

but he also indicated they had been losing sales to lack of TSA approval as well, so I don't think they get those sales back until they are ready to upgrade or until they have add on orders....but that's now behind them and now they are a player in the etd market with the best tech and should quickly become the industry leader.

Your original objections (keep in context my comment you objected to).....I can even bring in many more quotes..or you can go back and read the threads.

A better solution is available and there will be no waiting around to get these because of reasoning that the purchase of something last year makes it necessary to wait till you get to an upgrade or replacement point.

I mean, if an entity has previously bought an inferior solution then they are not going to see themselves unable to better protect themselves (and the people made vulnerable as well), then they are not thinking clearly.

Its an upgrade. And a necessary one at that. The only sense where this is a replacement is that the old technology is going to be deep sixed due to the superiority of the new technology. The idea is to be absolutely sure... and to compete.

This is now your argument.

There will not be a wholesale replacing of technology purchased in prior years.

Now why did you originally disagree with my comment? If what you say is true in your last post, and I'm misinterpreting what your said or taking your comments out of context, then what was it with my original comment that you so decisively disagreed with, because I think you are now arguing that you agree with me. And if you agreed with me, why so vehemently argue against me? I'm thoroughly confused.

I'm done...the board doesn't have to see us banter anymore. If you want to defend yourself one more time go ahead, but I'm done responding.