Replies to post #4648 on Secure Point Technologies Inc (fka IMSCQ)

[b9molecule]

thanks, whazoo.


"when the student is ready the teacher will appear" :)


~b9molecule

[insideoutsideupside]

Imperial...be intellectually honest in your arguments. There is no need to state what I say is tripe or fatuas or consider what i've stated as raising seeds of doubt. Please don't put that on me as that's not where I come from.

Go back and read the posts. Here is my comment that you objected to starting our back and forth.

but he also indicated they had been losing sales to lack of TSA approval as well, so I don't think they get those sales back until they are ready to upgrade or until they have add on orders....but that's now behind them and now they are a player in the etd market with the best tech and should quickly become the industry leader.

What's there to argue in that?

You have been trying to justify your objection to this comment ever since, instead of simply realizing there is nothing to object to.

Keep this comment of mine in context and then look at your arguments.

You indicated budget wasn't a concern, previous purchases aren't a concern, replacement isn't a concern..everyone needs the best tech and can't risk not having it (when there ARE adequate products in existence)..but then also argued almost exactly what i stated above... that recent purchases will not be replaced but Implant may be in consideration for add on purchase.

Even Darryl Jones indicated on the CC that previous purchasers will likely not be buyers until the end of their product lifecycles...granted he also indicated most have bought years ago and are ready to replace now.

So in reality you argue simply to argue the justification of your original objection. And If I understand you correctly, you don't seem to agree with with that objection, but agree with me..