InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Rawnoc

02/01/13 3:35 PM

#213130 RE: P2O I'm from MO #213129

Well, I guess that seals it then, a non-patented catalyst that nobody knows the formula isn't something innovative because...

I'm sorry, why again? I lost my train of thought.

lol

Is the patent application rejection as likely as an SEC settlement rejection or is it as likely as they never filed an application in the first place, which I heard millions of times?

So now if I understand correctly the non-existent patent application actually exists but because there's a baseless prediction that it will be rejected that means the catalyst which isn't even part of it is not innovative?

Do I have that clear now? Excellent!

I think this story has patent-potential.
icon url

Steady_T

02/01/13 3:44 PM

#213134 RE: P2O I'm from MO #213129

PATTENT APPLICATION REVEALED

JBI's patent application with the World Patent Office is now public.

It is innovative. Unlike most of the other patented processes this one works and it works well.

The catalyst makes a huge difference, the engineering details also make it successful.

That broad attempt at a patent may not be specific enough, and that's fine. Having the engineering details as a trade secret has its advantages.
icon url

paige386

02/01/13 5:26 PM

#213193 RE: P2O I'm from MO #213129

Funny I don't see any of them making fuel

I'm sure there are lots and lots of drawings of big drums.

but can they make sweet looking FUEL to sell?

I think NOT