Replies to post #26106 on XpresSpa Group Inc (XSPA)

[xlt leader]

Each word in an article is selected by the writer. Why would you state $30 million and not indicate that the past damages could create a much larger larger award? The omission is the bias. Why indicate that Google says we will appeal and win without a corresponding comment form VRNG? Writers have biases. This writer may personally believe that small companies should not be taken seriously by investors hence the trivial nature of the wording. Some people are small cap investors and others would not touch any stock with a market cap lower than 1 or 2 billion. I am not saying the writer did this with an agenda BUT I am saying that as a writer it was not written to show what the true picture is. Why? That is a question only the writer can answer.