Replies to post #5999 on Rambus (RMBS)

[smd1234]

My THEORY, b/c it was "request to reconsider or for a mistrial" is that it was DJ related.

I now see WHY Rambus took "advice of counsel" off the table:

due to DJ being involveed actively only up to a point in time, the VALUE of asserting "advice of counsel" was limited

AND

they got DJ'S testimony in testifying as to "what occurred"

[JMKel]

It might have been their mistaken notion that Rambus was pleading "advice of attorney" as a defense.