so, I was just watching Kit Bond, Republican Senator, member of the Intelligence Committee, explain that this is all unnecessary, because we all know now that Wilson's trip to Africa didn't cast doubt on whether Saddam was trying to get uranium from Niger, rather it supported that view, and furthermore, that Wilson's trip wasn't authorized by Dick Cheney, no it was authorized by his wife, so Wilson himself by misrepresenting the findings of this trip is to blame for his wife being outed as a CIA agent in the press. [This was all supposed to make sense.]
I need to be enlightened a little more. Why exactly was it that Libby and Rove decided it was necessary to tell Novak and others about Plame's job, when all they had to do was to point to Wilson's work itself, that Bond says actually supported their allegations about Saddam in the first place? If the latter is true, all they had to do was get the exculpatory evidence from Wilson's trip published.