but that is what is so compelling for me about P2O
it literally appeals to diverse interest groups :)
there are those who will note the recycling aspect (plastic problem)
there are those who will embrace the energy independence route with all that that entails
there are those who will recognize a technology in its infancy and understand exactly what that means with *viability* and commercial success
there are those who will applaud the jobs that will be forthcoming across the country as a direct result of this tech over the coming decade
P2O/P2F makes it easy because of its appeal across multiple levels
as i've previously noted .. PROS (when they embrace) will make plastic a commodity .. like they do with everything else .. for me the key was the filing by JBI on 8.4.11 >> which ensured co.s *survival* >> to say nothing of mgmt's ability to lay *foundations* and create *leverage* of their own these past years :)
best of all continues to be the co.s SS .. i prefer the reality and realistic time frames .. check any sector leaders' SS when they debuted (IPO) >> then 12 to 18 mos later >> then 5 years on
and note what PROS' *interest* does to the SS ..
the only question i have left is if the co. goes the accretive acquisition route or doesn't >> effectively going it alone with other partners on par with rock tenn
the difference in PPS .. *imo* will be worth the wait if that is the route *chosen*