InvestorsHub Logo

chase3357

01/05/13 7:01 PM

#9564 RE: SEC26 #9562

DD is good! This shows that we are set for good fireworks. Whether it be in favor or not, this will be one hell of a ride!

Go CIRC!

WillForeall

01/05/13 7:10 PM

#9565 RE: SEC26 #9562

I'm not surprised by this at all. Playboy wants the case in Cali but CIRC filed first so I would think the state of Illinois has jurisdiction. Playboy is trying to play dirty, imagine that! ;-) lolzzz

Playboy is only going to screw themselves with these tactics. IMO

It will be interesting to see CIRC PR update soon...

GLA!

feel-free

01/05/13 7:10 PM

#9566 RE: SEC26 #9562

Of course they are trying to scare Cirtran by suing them back!!! It's a trick by the richer company!!!!

starman2

01/05/13 9:27 PM

#9573 RE: SEC26 #9562

The whole point of playbev/Circ suing playboy was because they tried to terminate contract , illegally, So if the judge sees it that way, then there is no trademark infringement ...imo