I've heard many agree with that, the one's that know me understand my conservative nature. As you well know there's a lot to this one, and all over the place geographically.
If investors would go back and again read thoroughly how this company is proceeding, [ http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=8872651 ], and given what we know about their strategic plan and current business model. I see NO reason why .15c would not be a reasonable target.
But, after a few hours of pondering recent data too include all the above, my minimum short term target is holding for the next 2 quarters. All considered including current balance sheet I believe it would be a disservice to think 'pennies' and not 'quarters'. No pun intended :)
I also stated in one of the sticky-notes what I like to do is go back a year or more, then try and think as investors would have then. Asking oneself; is the same biz-model/plan that got everyone excited enough to pay $1.50 a share still in place only NOW this company is starting to bear-fruit? http://stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=STOA&p=d&b=1&g=0&id=p17970548896 Was it worth $1.50 then based on forward-looking values? It must have been. So, are the same forward-looking values still in place only NOW... the company is starting to take off with tangible assets.
Over the past two years Volume & A/D changes have been pretty stagnate, but, in just the past three weeks?
Let's see here... a few pennies or a few Quarters? :)
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
