Replies to post #5764 on Rambus (RMBS)

[smd1234]

CITES FOR MY POST
SEE pp 15-16

http://www.ftc.gov/os/adjpro/d9302/050810ccmosancattach.pdf

and

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/ts_search.pl?title=28&sec=1404

[Threejack]

re: The real Q is whether Watz is correct, i.e., whether an adverse ruling on unclean hands will be enough of a push to get 'em to settle.


Hey smd1234,

Agree. Review of the Markman on "device" may give the Cartel pause even with no unclean hands ruling against Rambus.

Those DOJ documents scheduled for release this week may cause a reaction. Hope we get to read some of them.

Threejack