Replies to post #64575 on Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD)

[aleph0]

...and those that agreed ?

Nine major firms agree to AMD discovery requests
... http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=24350

Dell agrees to AMD subpoena request
... http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=26039

Rackable strikes deal with AMD over Intel documents
... http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=25955

Intel admits it locked out AMD from PC vendors
... http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=26774





...and the other "raids" ?



Intel offices raided by European Commission
... http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=24554

South Korean FTC investigates Intel
... http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=25262




...and this :

Intel class actions number 36 plus
... http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=25834



Thx to Inquirer's thorughness : http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=24847


PS:
Those 9 mentioned above, are now 13+ if I remember rightly !
Where there's smoke, there's fire !

[j3pflynn]

wbmw - Perhaps you ought to read the articles you linked to again. Those companies didn't refute anything, they merely objected to the subpoenas on technicalities.
Paul

[Jules2]

Posted by: wbmw
In reply to: Jules2 who wrote msg# 64571
Date:10/29/2005 1:34:43 PM
Post #of 64648

Re: Have you noticed the people who were SPECIFICALY named did NOT refute what was stated in the complaint.

On the contrary, many of them DID.

But don't let facts get in the way....

http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=27080
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=24994

I didn't metion NEC or Toshiba.

I know it's difficult but try a little harder.
Hint: What is quackomole???

Jules