Replies to post #597 on Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD)

[spokeshave]

Elmer: Please show us where I made this statement you are attributing to me.

You're right. You did not say:

has proven to be unmanufacturable

Instead, you said:

has proven to be, so far, unmanufacturable.

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=827518

Then you went on to provide a rather bizzare definition of "manufacturable":

Do I need to provide a definition of manufacturable? It's something that can be produced at a profit, and it usually requires some repeatability and meeting of schedules.

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=827633

As others pointed out, Opteron is indeed manufacturable, despite your attempts to redefine the word to suit your agenda. Incidentally, Webster's unabridged dictionary does not even list "unmanufacturable" as a word. However, if you look up "manufacture" you get the following:

the process or operation of making wares or other material products by hand or by machinery especially when carried on systematically with division of labor

The fact that some Opteron samples exist proves that they are in fact manufacturable. Pick a different FUD buzzword. This one is no good anymore.

[KeithDust2000]

Elmer,

I suspect that you wouldn't even know what features were turned off. As long as they were fully operational you wouldn't know the difference.

Newisys would know the difference, and they would tell you if you asked. Actually, they guarantee it.

Please show us where I made this statement you are attributing to me. The only reference I can find is a statement you made. Are you quoting yourself and criticizing me for your own statements? That's dishonest. Don't go that route because nobody wins.

the design has proven to be, so far, unmanufacturable

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=827518

You didn´t even make any efforts to look that up yourself.
It seems to me you are totally lacking the ability to admit mistakes, and rather choose the route of subtle personal attacks like the one above to somehow save yourself.
This latest exchange affirms my first impression of your postings. I think this statement sums up your attitude nicely:

"I already turned out to be right, as I always do, but you have to wait a long time to see how you fair."
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=818174

This arrogant and concescending tone can be found in almost every posting you make, and gives me the impression you are only here to provoke people. The funny thing is, you would be the first to point it out if anyone else would behave the way you do yourself.

You know it best yourself that there is no point in arguing with someone who thinks he is always right, even about things he hardly knows anything about. That´s why I´ll refrain from doing it if you don´t change your attitude and tone.

Regards,