InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

litton51

12/19/12 3:37 PM

#59391 RE: bacatcha #59390

Very nicely argued. However, what is the chance the judge will admit he did a poor job in the first place (after three months) and grant Calypso's motion?
icon url

drkazmd65

12/19/12 3:57 PM

#59392 RE: bacatcha #59390

Actually - seems well argued to me,... IF the plain term language was used in the patent - and the patent was approved with that language,....

Would seem to me that the language intended and approved in the patent would be what should be used in defining the terms.

Now,...will the arguements have any effect on Judge Payne's earlier construction? That remains to be seen.

Good work (IMO) on the part of our lawyers.
icon url

On2_addict

12/20/12 6:08 AM

#59394 RE: bacatcha #59390

The best part is at the end.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Claim Construction Memorandum and Order
issued by Magistrate Judge Payne is VACATED. The Court will issue a new Order addressing
each of the terms in dispute.
icon url

bacatcha

12/26/12 1:26 PM

#59410 RE: bacatcha #59390

T-Mobile Case Filing: Calypso Reply to Response Re: Motion to Reconsider Order on Motion to Compel

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/49946173/Calypso%20Wireless%20Reply%20.pdf