InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

fatherofseven

12/07/12 10:51 AM

#22355 RE: Justice98 #22352

Steve Kim doesn't call it a long shot... much less, "at best"...

He acknowledges we're speculating, and speculates most notably that:

"Unlike the jury, Judge Jackson's findings concerning the royalty base must have specific support in the record. And the only evidence in the record is Dr. Becker's testimony regarding the royalty base. Because of Google's strategic trial decision not to offer a competing number, I believe that the most likely outcome on the royalty base issue is that the running royalty will be based upon 20% of Google's U.S. ad revenues. It would be virtually impossible for Google to successfully challenge such a finding on appeal, and in fact, that is the only royalty base figure that is absolutely supported by the trial record."