Replies to post #17047 on ANTs Software Inc. (fka ANTS)

[Rbb1822]

And as anyone that has done any research can tell you, the relationship between Ants and IBM was anything but a "facade". It may not have worked out yet, but a "facade" it most definitely was not.

[wingtrade]

Congrats on a nice day here so far... I hope your investment turns out well. That said, you need to relax about my post:
- The statements I made regarding the massive negative cash flow, increase in O/S, and lack of fins are all completely true.
- I clearly provided evidence of newsletter stock promotion going on in this stock from the beginning of this year.
- I clearly provided evidence of ironridge being a dilutive force in the OTC stocks they 'invest' in.
- Notice how I said it was because they were going to get millions and millions of shares ... that is past tense for a reason... they did not get all the shares, luckily for you and all other ANTS longs.
- Lastly, with regard to IBM: The deal that once was revenue-producing for the company but, according to all available evidence that I have seen, subsequently ceased to be revenue-producing. When the stock was being promoted earlier this year, the IBM link was being touted relentlessly even though all evidence pointed to a complete freeze in that relationship... no matter what you say, that is a facade that was used to pump the stock and fool new ANTS investors at the time.

Maybe, but then why do certain posters go to the effort of skewing information in an obvious attempt to shake investors confidence? A lot more people read these boards than post. That fraudulent post last Sunday night is exhibit A. I know more about this company than most and that post startled me. After about a minute it made me mad that I had been momentarily taken in. Generally bashers don't resort to impersonation, so this was new to me. The following excerpt from a post of yours is clearly In large part from your imagination, but an imagination with a purpose. You effectively tied Ants stock to stock promoting con men with absolutely no proof. And you expect us to believe it wasn't meant to shake the investors confidence???? Why are the most unethical people on this board screaming the loudest about ethical matters?

"This company was hemorrhaging cash into Q1 2011 when they stopped filing financials. Net LOSS for the 3 months ended March 31, 2011 was 27 million dollars.
Subsequently the O/S rose - in the dark i.e. no more 10-Q's - from 132 million to 300 million shares, maxing out the A/S. Someone on the board asked why Ironridge would invest... i'll tell you: it was because they were going to get millions and millions of shares for next to nothing and then run a stock promotion campaign and dummp a ton of shares into the market in conjunction with OTC stock promo sharks on the backs of gullible investors and who could not see past the shiny IBM facade. "