InvestorsHub Logo

oc631

11/29/12 10:35 AM

#153248 RE: genisi #153238

Evolution in the HCV treatment paradigm




From a business standpoint treating a GT3 patient twice is ideal. We are seeing 90%+ SVR rates in GT1 and GT2. What's the best that we can expect in GT3 with GILD's two drug combo? Improving on existing SOC in GT3 isn't a high hurdle and I would expect that GILD's combo is up to that task.


I'm a longtime supporter of using a nucleotide backbone in oral therapy because of the drugs strong resistance profile. This doesn't mean I condone multiple shots on goal. It would be interesting to see how well GT3 patients would fare if they would were treated with the three drug combo being tested in GT1.

The discrepancy between GT2 and GT3 SVR rates so far is apparent and I would expect the trend to continue. I agree naives will look better than intolerant patients.






oc631

12/01/12 12:29 AM

#153396 RE: genisi #153238

RE: GILD PR



All patients receiving sofosbuvir/RBV became HCV RNA negative on treatment and relapse accounted for all virologic failures.





It's quite clear GILD found no resistant variants to sofosbuvir in this study. Did they also test for ribavirin resistance? The resistance profile of generic riba could be the achilles heel in successfully treating second-line GT3 failures.

dewophile

12/01/12 9:17 AM

#153397 RE: genisi #153238

Perhaps there will be a predictor such as patients on sofosbuvir/RBV not achieving undetectable after 4 weeks, should be given GS-5885



GS-5885, as far as i can tell, is not active in genotypes 2 and 3