Replies to post #19839 on In Ovations Holdings Inc. (INOH)

[DJ Ponder]

ADDRESS THIS:

Kimber I am attempting to work with you so we can agree to put some claims to rest. But we cannot move forward if you don't respond. Perhaps it was just an oversight. Here is what I posted, its the proof of the paid promotions you said didn't happen:

Why is it you are repeatedly given PROOF yet you choose to ignore it? So here is the proof kimber, read it and respond so we can all agree as to the accuracy of the information and can then put at least this false claim of yours to rest.

Company: Mexp
3 Month :
Promoter: The Next Hot Sxxxx
Compensation:
one hundred seventy five thousand shares, by a third party. OFC intends to sell its shares.
Date: 2/22/2011

Company: Mexp
3 Month :
Promoter: Lightning Sxxxxx
Compensation:
one hundred seventy five thousand shares, by a third party. OFC intends to sell its shares.
Date: 2/22/2011

Company: Mexp
3 Month :
Promoter: Emerging Gxxxxx
Compensation:
one hundred seventy five thousand shares, by a third party. OFC intends to sell its shares.
Date: 2/22/2011

Company: Mexp
3 Month :
Promoter: WallStreetOxxxxxxx.xxx
Compensation:
one hundred seventy five thousand shares, by a third party. OFC intends to sell its shares.
Date: 2/22/2011

So kimber1911 can we agree that the above information does indeed prove once and for all, that your claim there were no paid promos since 2011 is a false one?

Quote:Another claim, just like the false claim that MEXP paid 50 grand in promos, still zero proof,

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=81723829

ADDRESS IT KIMBER.

[DJ Ponder]

Come on man you know better, its always been mexp's "accumulated deficit".

Your whole statement is based incorrectly on "liability" and should be disregarded. The proper wording is accumulated deficit. Lets keep the information posted here ACCURATE.

[Apophis]

You are right, they must have paid this off.

[Raider21]

Kimber1911: I continue to be amazed at the nonsense figures you continue to come up with. Like our diver law suit - 50k. Where did you get that. Haven't you read any of the previous posts? As to the combined divers suit along with other non-diver persons enjoined in the suit, you can nearly double that amount. Then you just happened to forget about Webber. That amount is around $200k plus the government fees of around $30k MEI stuck him with. Do you think for one moment, if MEI had any solvency Webber isn't going to sue for what he's personally owed plus damages? Facts are facts which some people find it hard to accept.

[VeronicaFox]

Nonsense, 1911. It's not the only lawsuit! Have you ever read the self created quarterlies?? They are being sued by more than ONE. And where is this "$50 grand" number coming from? It's been stated right here as higher. Let's please keep the data here factual.

You also said why didn't MEXP lie about revenue in the past? They did, 1911! They ALWAYS said we were finding treasure and making money! But we never heard that they were actually stiffing their divers and abandoning them on some island, now did we? Goldberg said in February that we WOULD BE CASH FLOW POSITIVE IN 60-90 DAYS. It's almost December. Do you see any cash flow? I see a NO BID stock.

in the pink sheet world, sometimes these companies MAKE STUFF UP. The least we can do is keep the data here FACTUAL.

This is really not difficult, let's not make it out to be.

"Come on, lets get real, the 50 grand divers suit would not the only suit then"