I'm not going to tell you why it's all good. You only quoted part of my post. The other part was a bit of a medical analogy for CAGRs status...
"But the discussion is really whether CAGRs condition is terminal or critical. Anyone who's not wearing rose colored glasses knows its not stable."
I'd say its pretty clear that I don't believe "it's all good". So please don't imply that I did. All I said is that it may not be as bad as all the doom and gloom you and others are preaching. No one who I would consider knowledgable about the specifics has explicitly said who controls the wine, which is the main asset under the CAGR umbrella ($ value of it is a separate argument that I'm not getting into - again, no proof of anything).
And no, even if you and pantherj speak confidently and act as if you have info others don't have, I don't consider your posts as proof of anything.