InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Tom K

03/06/03 12:10 PM

#9023 RE: sarai #9010

Read the book. Bush wasn't handed a run-of-the-mill economic pullback, let alone a correction. To call it a "bubble" minimizes enormous severity of the economic situation in the late 90s.
icon url

sylvester80

03/06/03 12:18 PM

#9029 RE: sarai #9010

Actually the lax rules of the economic excesses (the ability of CON execs to commit fraud) that was a major cause of the bubble were passed (over a Clinton veto) by the GOP control congress on their "contract ON America" by the Newt clan.

icon url

ergo sum

03/06/03 1:21 PM

#9075 RE: sarai #9010

Sara

When XYZ Corp starts loosing money they don't start spending more money. They cut costs and start trying to put themselves on the road to higher revenues. Not in 10 years but now. This is the real failure of the Bush Administration. They accelerated the revenue decline and increased spending. Sure revenues have declined since 2000 but the Administration did not respond by cutting spending. They chose rather to cut taxes. This is (in my word of the day) feckless.

Ergo Sum