Looks like you're cherry picking. He was absolved of all your accusations:
In connection with the two sets of FINRA allegations above, on May 20, 2009, Mr. Poutre filed a lawsuit against Maxx Trade in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. Mr. Poutre claimed among other things, that the principal owners of Maxx Trade added, without Mr. Poutre’s knowledge, a separate commission on top of the fair and reasonable commission Poutre had charged his bond clients. This resulted in the impermissible mark-ups that were the subject of the July 16, 2010 AWS. Mr. Poutre also claimed that Maxx Trade filed claims with FINRA that were inaccurate and defamatory resulting in Mr. Poutre becoming the subject of the FINRA inquiry that was the subject of the April 20, 2009 AWS. These allegations were also made in connection with a parallel FINRA arbitration Mr. Poutre brought against Maxx Trade and its principals. Pursuant to the arbitration, on February 15, 2011 Mr. Poutre was awarded compensatory damages, interest, attorneys’ fees, and costs with respect to his claims against Maxx Trade and its principals.