Litton, I think you are reading too much into only one part of the court case. If settlement was eminent then both parties would ask for a stay just like they did two years ago. In addition I can think of no legal mechanism that would allow the judge to hold off making one legal determination while continuing to rule on other parts of the case without some request by the parties or a determination by the judge that would get put down on paper and made part of the record.
I believe that the judge wants to get it right. He knows that T-Mobile's entire case will hinge on these definitions. If there is any legal (not factual) point of attack that T-Mobile will be able to use to overturn a ruling in our favor it is likely to be how these terms are defined and what they mean in regards to not just T-Mobile but the entire industry.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
