Look we all know that GTGP is under the microscope now and so how Jim reacts to inquiries is of great importance. He can't just throw around loose facts without any backup. He discussed the questions with Finra and offered backup. Finra seemed to accept what they were told and until we are told otherwise it seems uncalled for to assume otherwise. Did Jim have to put out this notice to the shareholders? I don't know, do you?
There has been a lot of opinion on this board on what has happened and not happened regarding assets, hot runs, Oak Ridge, the purchase of MSE, etc. Some of these issues have been put to rest for me and I don't feel I need to explain why - call it woman's intuition - that's just as valid as everything else put out here lately.
The big question in my mind is why this conversation took place in the first place. Again assumptions are being made to the negative side but we really don't know why these questions were being asked - who knows "the commons" may all be pleasantly surprised.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
