InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

radiumsoup

11/08/12 3:43 PM

#19008 RE: sasi #19005

the con is that they expire (and the market for them is less liquid).

I hold no VRNG stock, only warrants and some (soon to expire worthless, it appears) November call options.
icon url

mantis

11/08/12 3:45 PM

#19010 RE: sasi #19005

if stock falls to 2-3 and stays there for 3 years you will lose all the premium on warrants. 100% loss. If you own stock them you lose much less. Buying warrants is cheaper if you are sure that you are going to make $.
icon url

nsomniyak

11/08/12 3:52 PM

#19019 RE: sasi #19005

One further distinction. As a warrant holder you would not participate in any shareholder votes. Not an issue for retail players whose votes would not have significant influence anyway.
icon url

tduggan

11/08/12 4:45 PM

#19034 RE: sasi #19005

The biggest con would be if PPS doesn't appreciate significantly. For example, say the PPS topped out at $7.00.

IF you bought a share today @ $3.50, you would have 100% ROI at $7.00, whereas the warrant you bought today would only bring you about 40% ROI @ PPS of $7.00 ( $7.00 less $5.05 excercise price less $1.40 warrant cost gives $0.55 ROI on your $1.40 or about 40%).

Does that make sense?