Replies to post #1454 on Superwipes, Inc. (fka SPWP)

[zatoichi]

How about this for a newsflash:

This is a publicly traded company.

As such we are entitled to a lot more transparency than a comment that goes like this:

"I answer to the court".

Guess what? CG also answers to any question relating to SEC regulations too.

I do not make up the rules. I only expect that everyone has to do the same.

[ORCA]

SPWP.And the Answer to this Gerhardt Character.How do you like the answer?
Subject: Charlie: Answer This...
Date: 10/14/2005 5:02:09 PM Eastern Standard Time


Mr. Gerhardt,

Your last email said nothing to the effect of the current court's ruling. Are you trying to mislead these investors by insinuating certain outcomes?
The only factual information you have provided in regard to the case is that the Settlement Agreement was not approved by the court. That says NOTHING in regard to liquidation, and is indeed a good outcome for Superwipes.
Tell us investors this: how do you get paid?

Shareholder


Cc: 'Quenneville, Mario '
Subject: RE: Superwipes NOT Liquidated!!! Good News! Bankruptcy
Sensitivity: Confidential


Let me respond:



Attached my appointment and I am in charge of the Debtor’s Estate. Also Attached are the Debtor’s Schedules for your reference.



I answer to the Court.



Mario has been relieved of his duties and instructed to forward me the keys and web page access codes.



This is the Bankruptcy address http://www.txs.uscourts.gov/index.html and the case number is 02-39372 . Check it out for yourselves.



Charlie Gerhardt

[zatoichi]

Let's have Charlie respond to this:

SEC rules apply to everyone. Period.

The communications that were sent via email were outside public access. That means that there is a lack of transparency. This does violate SEC rules for publicly traded companies.

To all other stockholders:

Please examine the BK rules and procedures. That will not be terribly enlightening but it is a start. If anyone knows of people who are involved in BK (presumably as former or current trustees, attorneys with BK experience or accountants with BK experience) you should be able to shed light as to whether or not we were experiencing best practices from CG.

If CG is deficient in any way then we, as shareholders, have a right to complain.

One might ask to whom?

Answer: the Chief Administrator of the Federal Courts. John Roberts who was recently named, confirmed and sworn in as Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court.

The flimsy nature of this whole mess should be brought to light. Seriously, a minority stock holder and minority debt holder bringing about BK? Give me a break. This is so ridiculous that it would be laughable if it were not true and had real consequences for the rest of us.

When we get enough information we should consider filing a complaint with CJ Roberts and do what we can to make CG and WD miserable via lawful and ethical due process.