So if he pays for advertising he is a Pump and Dumper,
but if he doesn't pay for advertising he is a bad CEO?
He says this is not a typical penny stock and that he is not a typical pennystock CEO, and you chastise him for it. Then he acts accordingly, and you get upset that he isn't acting like a typical pennystock CEO?
Personal agenda much?
If Mr. Samblis said the sky was blue, would you chastise him for not being a weatherman, and then claim he doesn't report on the blueness of the sky often enough? Me thinks you would