pom, I side with the group that says since this stock has doubled yoy, 3 years in a row, and will likely do so this year (made it there but has retreated some, and will soon recover), that such reality is not only wishful thinking, it exceeds wishful thinking.
If you have owned this stock longer than you have been posting here, as you have stated, you know this. If your definition of wishful thinking is greater than the reality of this stock, such reality having bested essentially 99.999 stocks ever, why do you suggest that the reality of this stock hasn't lived up to everyone's wishful thinking, when in fact it has exceeded every reasonable measure of wishful thinking?
The folks you comment on as being wishful thinkers have a far better chance of being right than any critics of their expectations.
So, you are asked simply, what do you distinguish as being correct if you do not accept the (3 years running correct) predictions of the wishful thinkers.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
