InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

acrazjo

11/02/12 11:04 AM

#14913 RE: sluicer #14912

I don't think that is right. someone more legally attached please respond. No harm no foul just the facts madam. I thought if they agreed on one for infringement it carried the whole lot. May be wrong, some one correct me. Read that somewhere.
icon url

ThinkingMan

11/02/12 11:05 AM

#14914 RE: sluicer #14912

No, any infringement is enough to side with vrng. From everything I read... if any part is found to be infringed upon, then it's infringement. They don't have to see infringement in every claim, just infringement in even only one claim is still infringement. A couple of the recent articles talked about that.