I don't think that is right. someone more legally attached please respond. No harm no foul just the facts madam. I thought if they agreed on one for infringement it carried the whole lot. May be wrong, some one correct me. Read that somewhere.
No, any infringement is enough to side with vrng. From everything I read... if any part is found to be infringed upon, then it's infringement. They don't have to see infringement in every claim, just infringement in even only one claim is still infringement. A couple of the recent articles talked about that.