InvestorsHub Logo

realbiz

10/24/12 8:31 AM

#190249 RE: going #190248

Answers as requested, for the benefit of shareholders//As all can now read for themselves ...

doogdilinger

10/24/12 10:06 AM

#190252 RE: going #190248

14. Mr.Lehner,have you ever been approached by a stock promoter,who posts on the message board IHub, to do investor awareness (i.e. stock promotion campaign)....



Answer: On May 11, 2009, an iHub poster who had visited our office on a well-publicized tour, solicited our business, in writing, for his professional services. We did not consider the solicitation inappropriate because we are routinely approached by stock awareness organizations. We enquired further with him as to what he had in mind, but were not able to proceed further for a combination of reasons. These include (A) The fact that Winning Brands at the time was not yet Current Information tier. It is a violation of regulations to carry out the promotion of stock for which there is not “adequate public information” available, particularly if during the same period exempt share subscription(s) are under way. (B) The share price at the time, approximately .0049 was in the opinion of the company going to increase naturally by itself on the basis of growing interest in the firm. The creation of additional demand through promotional activity would in my view have created a non-sustainable spike. (C) Stock promotion, even when it is legal, is extremely expensive. The firm did not have the requisite budget, even if the right circumstances had been present. After careful consideration, the company therefore respectfully declined the interest that had been expressed in providing such services to us. In retrospect, it was the correct decision, because the share price did continue to advance naturally from .0045 in mid-May 2009 through higher lows until June 7, 2010, with active trading. In the summer of 2010, the prospect of losing the Walmart account alarmed many watching WNBD, including the formal Market Makers. This was a primary catalyst for the sudden decline in the share price at the time. The current market capitalization (“value”) of the company is too low, in my opinion, relative to its merits and progress and will increase again, despite the current O/S. For the record, Walmart ordering resumed and things are fine with this account.



Hey Eric...at the very end of my very public 2 hour visit asking you a simple matter of interest question about whether you were considering engaging in any promo/awareness is a question not a solicitation! And you telling me "no not at this time but I’m welcome to email you an example of what an awareness campaign consists of" is just that...me emailing you an example of what an awareness campaign consisted of as per your request! I mean do you really think readers are stupid enough to think that if my much publicized visit back then was really a promo solicitation that you would've waited 3 and a half years to call it that?

Furthermore in our only subsequent follow up meeting in Sept 2009 it was you who called me and invited me out for dinner...supposedly because you wanted to pick my brain on how promo actually worked in conjunction with 504 share leakage...and you also asked me if I could source alternative financing instruments for WNBD at that time.

So you're right that you didn't consider my QUESTION inappropriate during my shareholder visit...just like I didn’t consider your follow up dinner invitation a SOLICITATION lol sheesh!


Black Beerd

10/24/12 10:31 AM

#190254 RE: going #190248

In response to the answers from the CEO. I respect the fact that he indeed at the very least addressed the questions and did so with some class. Each of those responses can be blown apart but whats been said past and present still holds true to the status of the health of the company. I see him writing these answers out at his desk with rose colored glasses on spinning things as best he can for the shareholder to again be satisfied with. By the nature and content of his blogs he is very good at being a paper tiger.

At the end of the day the investment community wants to see measurable results...the mere fact that these questions being asked 7yrs into his reign as CEO speaks volumes. Then having to own up to these questions should serve as an eye opener for his own conscience. The PPS, dilution, the chill, cash burn, no branding value is all on his watch as CEO. That he has got to own up to and take responsibility for and in some instances I think he has

I again, thank Eric for the decency of responding and I for one do find that commendable but it cannot over shadow the reality that he has a huge mess on his hands ..a company without adequate operational cash to survive and I use that word seriously..."SURVIVE" , that on every level is a cancer and catastrophic to the company. He remains positive but everyone knows with those results no one can be remotely be happy or satisfied with that. If he has his own cash in this I can assure you he isn't sleeping at nights.

So Big E...I applaud the time and effort taken to respond to some very good questions, I don't agree and can dispute many of your answers and its content because ultimately...how your graded as a CEO and a company is done with measurable results. Unfortunately there are no free passes or good excuses that should be given to satisfy the shareholder. You are charged as a CEO with one objective...create shareholder value.

all jmo.

ORCA

10/24/12 10:33 AM

#190255 RE: going #190248

I HAVE TO SAY=CONGRATS TO MR.LEHNAR FOR ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS,VERY WELL.HE BLEW AWAY THE QUESTIONARY.WELL DONE.

louisa

10/24/12 6:00 PM

#190314 RE: going #190248

What if you are a shareholder who does not read this board?


Memo to iHub Moderator –

Answers as requested, for the benefit of shareholders:



Will this be on the blog or PR'd as an open letter to shareholders?

I know some folks who still own this from years ago and would never know about this board. Just curious how this info can be democratically shared with all shareholders.

I was under the impression shareholder information means for all shareholders not some shareholders.

flaflyersfan

10/24/12 9:32 PM

#190332 RE: going #190248

An E-mail so inspiring that it caused nobody to buy even 1 share of WNBD stock @ .0002 today. EOM