I laughed at the title when I read it.
1. Zynga was 7% vs 10 %. ( This isn't taking into account it is 7% of greater revenues.
2. Both Zynga and facebook are trying to distance themselves from relying too heavily on each other. ( YET, still revenues were 7% of much greater over all revenues. )
I just love when someone gives a misleading title and then pulls the snake oil salesman bit getting people to believe or not believe what is right in front of them in black and white.
I could go on, but I think smart investors can dissect what it all means and started to do so already in after hours without garbage articles like this one which are meant to deceive.
** Don't get me wrong, I am not a huge fan of zynga and prefer another stock personally. But deceiving people for personal gain is always wrong. To be clear I am talking about the article not your link ***