InvestorsHub Logo

doogdilinger

10/18/12 12:53 PM

#190057 RE: lbdave #190053

Yep hilarious watching people defend the logic behind what took him 7 years to finally figure out the bottle was supposedly flawed.

Just goes to show the severe lack of any real planning in the entire biz plan from day 1.

Perhaps eric should've been improving the bottle 4 years ago instead of pumping out literally hundreds of emails, board memos and blogs about what a world beating stock WNBD was gonna become when time has proven it's performed as miserably as every other diluting pig pos-land play and has landed all the way down the pos-land rat hole to oblivion at .0001 X .0002 with no financing and zero market liquidity in play...literally wiping out the entire shareholder family waiting for the dreaded reverse split blog spinning to begin!!!

wizkid1

10/18/12 12:55 PM

#190058 RE: lbdave #190053

Lbdave, If the bottle design was a limiting factor to qualifying for contracts, it could lead to more sales. Govt. absolutely has specifications for products that I've worked on that are similar to some of those listed in the new bottle design considerations.

Then again it may be just product improvement and have no impact on sales. But as you said, it's a positive step not a negative one.