InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

neilbolton

10/10/05 12:16 AM

#32193 RE: RockStar1 #32192

Mine isn't a theory Mario. It is backed up by the very informed opinion of an accountant and, more importantly, by the actual filing itself.

What I said is correct. Anyone eager to purchase shares under the prospectus could have done so if they wished.

As for the two offerings described in the prospectus under the Plan of Distribution. Those offerings are not part of the prospectus, but do include some shares offered under the prospectus. Those 2 offerings could have been made prior to September 30th, as the offerings are independent of the prospectus itself. The offerings need to be described as it is material information for people who wish to purchase other shares in the prospectus that are not included in those offerings.

Again, this information is stated clearly in the prospectus. Regarding both offerings, it stated:

None of the Warrants, the shares purchasable there under, the SunnComm restricted common stock, nor the units
themselves are being offered under this prospectus
. Only the registered shares of MediaMax common stock owned by SunnComm which comprise a portion of the units are being offered under this prospectus.


Regarding your comment:

understand that your constantly trying to shoot holes into our process/company,

I am not trying to shoot holes in the company. I am trying to correct what I see as incorrect statements.


icon url

kenco

10/10/05 7:50 AM

#32202 RE: RockStar1 #32192

"are you a Lawyer?", no more likely an investor trying to get straight and accurate information on the company, just as every investor is entitled to, and something that has proven quite elusive over the years with this company.