InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

BRIG_88

10/12/12 3:35 PM

#199836 RE: Rawnoc #199833

CORRECT. HOWEVER JBI did NOT pay for the SAIC service. Investors did. Ask and ye shall know.
icon url

the big guy

10/12/12 5:31 PM

#199854 RE: Rawnoc #199833

Rawnoc is correct. It is typical for a company to get third-party independent analysis done and those are exactly the words they use. I also think it is required for some companies by the SEC for large investments. Last year I worked in a large resources company and managed several third-party engineering efforts. it is required, and large enginering firms make a living off of doing this.

This document looks like it contains the most meat that I have seen so far on the commercial viability of JBI's p2o process. I don't know what it means yet, but it looks legitimate, and I will definitely have a closer look at it on the weekend. An "order-of magnitude" estimate is the highest-level estimate that can be done according to AACE standards.It is accurate to something like +40/-50 %.
icon url

ergo sum

10/12/12 6:33 PM

#199868 RE: Rawnoc #199833

...the SAIC report was commissioned by JBI as an independent review of its technology... Sure it does!