Replies to post #48628 on Kraig Biocraft Laboratories Inc (KBLB)

[es1]

Your logic for kblb being a better investment says that you had to buy at its first trading price, sit through 2 years of massive losses, then sit through late 2010 to now and be back at a loss

I dont know where you get this crap...

If you want to use your "logic" you need to prove it. Since FB is only 100 days old we will have to wait another 600 or so days to see if you are right.
And If you wish to look after 100 days KBLB was STILL a better investment.

The only reason it was a bad investment is because it ipo'd way too high. Did you see the p/e ratio at it's initial price? Yowza

Wrong. The reason it IPOd so high is zuckerberg spent million and millions to pump his IPO. I live in the SF bay area I saw it all first hand. FB is less than 15 min from me and the guy was EVERYWHERE the 2 weeks prior to the IPO. I would have shorted it to death when it IOPd but it never got away from the downtick rule.

Oh wait! FB gets audited, has actual revenue, and is not in fact a pink.

And this saved the investors in what way? they are STILL losing more and more.

They do have 1 thing in common. like FB KBLB

is not in fact a pink

I think that is the best point about the comparison. The things here that are repeated as a reason that we are a bad investment(OTC,unaudited,no revs, etc) are obviously no reason to leave a stock.
FB is proof that all those things together give no more security than Kims NDAs do.