InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

ThSeeker

10/06/12 1:44 PM

#106942 RE: Wyatt Earp #106941

If there is it may be because they "know something". For instance say, that there will never be a threat that will make them cover.
So far, for years they would be correct.

But I don't believe there is a short issue here. Just a lack of business.
icon url

lucmariepierre

10/06/12 3:03 PM

#106944 RE: Wyatt Earp #106941

this is easy to create false business and after to lose everything

this is more difficult to win each time
icon url

ctrumabll

10/06/12 3:08 PM

#106948 RE: Wyatt Earp #106941

Oh, come on. Reality dictates that nobody really shorts .0001 stock. It is all downside and no upside.

That price drop was caused by clean Gene selling tons of convertibles.
icon url

EarnestDD

10/08/12 2:13 PM

#106958 RE: Wyatt Earp #106941

Wyatt/ Re: Rumored Naked Short
RCCH has NO FTD's.
A buyer who did not get their shares would have reported the FTD.

ergo ... NO Shorts ... not even Naked shorts.
jmo
icon url

hypebuster

10/09/12 10:05 AM

#106962 RE: Wyatt Earp #106941

fact is, there is no naked shorthing here. i dont invest in rumors. rumors are just lies made up by the poster, plain and simple.
has anything POSITIVE happened to rcch since you bought in? if so, what was it? a rumor??
icon url

doughboy2

10/10/12 4:13 PM

#106983 RE: Wyatt Earp #106941

STILL!!!!?

It's been 2 + years of this "massive naked short" story.

How much more time will need to pass to tell?