Replies to post #6019 on XpresSpa Group Inc (XSPA)

[garyhalvo]

This also caught my eye.

1 Additional pre-trial motions are pending and will be addressed at a later date.
Case 2:11-cv-00512-RAJ-LRL Document 682 Filed 10/05/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 14956
as to these items is GRANTED. As to Item 2 (evidence concerning recent offers and other
negotiations for, and the 2011 purchase price of, the patent portfolio that included the patents-insuit)

[JJSeabrook]

I DID NOT KNOW THIS!

The Federal Circuit has held that "the parties that make and sell an infringing device are
joint tort-feasors with parties that purchase an infringing device for use or resale...." Shockley v.
Arcan Inc., 248 F.3d 1349,1364 (Fed. Cir. 2001). As a result, AOL, Gannett, IAC Search &
Media, and Target Corporation maybe be jointly and severally liable for any alleged
infringement with their co-defendant, Google, Inc. Furthermore, I/P Engine's damages expert,
Dr. Becker, has provided damages calculations as to AOL, Inc., Gannett Co., and Target
Corporation. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion in Limine No. 5 (ECF No. 307) is DENIED.

[LOL]

Mods should sticky this post, Vringo won almost everything, won all the big issues!

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=80268692

[ascientificmethod]

Every time I read this I get light headed!

[LOL]

Mods should sticky this post, Vringo won almost everything, won all the big issues!

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=80268692