InvestorsHub Logo

ArtieB

10/05/12 11:58 AM

#10350 RE: CEMJQ Multi-Millionaire #10349

Yes, I'm convinced that THABJ isn't sure WHEN to retroactively value the bank IN ADDITION to an award. As much as I liked the BK move, it could contribute to confusion. At first glance, one might honestly question the integrity of the bank's operations given its BK filing status. This may be THE reason why THABJ calld a motion hearing in an effort to gain clarification before her SJ, which, I believe is her intention. If I were the bank and govt., I would settle before she issues a SJ. It is NOT clear how THABJ will rule. Seems a settlement is what she is pushing for without saying, "I want both parties to negotiate a settlement."

VC

fredscott36

10/05/12 12:03 PM

#10351 RE: CEMJQ Multi-Millionaire #10349

...we believe the Judge's actions indicates she wants the parties to settle...........

...the OTS has not defended itself, IMO and it is obvious that the SEIZURE was done in bad faith by an OTS director who panicked when he saw the CRP and realized the bank would not be available to First Citizens or that someone on the inside of the OTS had shorted the stock and would lose big-time money if the bank succeeded, IMO.......Bowman grabbed the bank without cause and the FDIC, OCC and the Judge (and BuckleySandler) clearly know this, IMO..................

...problem: Guy represents the Plaintiff and has stated there will not be any discussion of a settlement..........NO WAY, period......why.....????......Guy knows something about the situation and will so advise the Judge (thru counsel) when the opportunity arises (11-14 or the date after the Defendant gets 2 30-day delays).............................so we wait........IMO.....................

...just one phone call, one gesture, one offer, one acknowledgement............................stock will spike to $2+ p/s when the market sees closure, IMO................today or in 14 months............but it will happen...................and justice, IMO = the damaged party could recover up to $1-BILLION in damages for this outrageous abuse of gov't power, IMO.....................Guy's going for it, IMO....so are we.......

mantis

10/05/12 12:32 PM

#10352 RE: CEMJQ Multi-Millionaire #10349

CEMJQ, What are these numbers you are talking about ? Can you at least give ballpark figures ? Thanks