Wrong. Read the judgment again. If you have read any penny stock promoter cases, you will see that the standard remedy is to ban the penny stock promoter from acting in any capacity with a penny stock firm.
I've re-read the judgement and find nothing to indicate that I made a mistake. It appears to me that the only restrictions on his involvement is he is not allowed to participate in a penny stock offering (and if you wish to count them, he is "restricted" from violating SEC rules/regs that everyone else is supposed to be restricted from). If you find otherwise, feel free to point it out.
Your assertions about standard remedies is moot. A final judgement in this matter has been issued. No other cases, judgments, remedies, etc. matter unless or until there is another case/judgement brought against Wilf.