InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

downsideup

09/27/12 3:36 PM

#58329 RE: downsideup #58328

Oddly enough, though, not having the ability to use manipulation of the market price of shares... also eliminates a risk factor that could be exploited in forcing gross undervaluation of the property by using a market pricing argument... that can't exist, now...



icon url

drkazmd65

09/27/12 4:12 PM

#58331 RE: downsideup #58328

DS - that matter has not escaped my, and I would guess most of our, notice.

We are stuck (for good or ill) at an individual comparison between the current market value of our CLYW stock (efectively nil), and what our personal cost-averages to buy it were as individual frames of reference for how much 'value' we are currently experiencing.

At North of your stated $2/share I would be a quite happy man and likely would have sold a fraction of my holdings to cover my investment costs. The rest would be riding it out to a bigger end.

However as you also point out in a subsequent post - it does also mean that we are not subject to market manipulators either. Double-edged sword and all that.

Whether we like it or not - barring individual sales transactions outside of markets,.... here we are, and here we stay until the Reciever decides this ride is done.

icon url

litton51

09/27/12 9:42 PM

#58345 RE: downsideup #58328

Thanks for the downer. 8*(