Replies to post #64199 on Global Technologies Group, Inc. (GTGP)

[sevenOdouble]

I know exactly what I said, its you who misinterpreted the + sign.
(As if there are 279k shorts + new shares on top of that...)
No, thats not what I meant, it was an addition to those that covered or not, I might as well used the & sign instead...

I'm not saying that the full amount of 279k are still uncovered but there hasn't been much opportunity to cover + there were new shares shorted ahead of the suspension news! OUCH!!

So what I said in both posts is spot on bro.
The short #'s derived from the bi-weekly report have gone up... can't hardly call that a decrease eh?! LOL

[TASBES0101]

I wonder if the party(ies) holding 1% of the float short would consider it not important if they have to cover?

But you are correct the short interest is not important as it is so minor it less than 1% of traceable Float here.