Replies to post #56691 on Colorado Goldfields Inc. (fka CGFI)

[Civicbird]

I hope $3 a share is nothing when compared to the bigger picture soon enough, MT.(I would love for Guyer to finally release total assays and we're looking at $1 billion plus) And hopefully a buyout for a benjamin or two not long after.

[1forall]

Thanks M_T_Pockets that was clear. I really liked your reference to a paint job. It explains everything. LOL

14all

[1forall]

[akgoldminor]

Dang it, MT, there you go again explaining things in a way that people can understand! Thanks, buddy!

GO CGFIA

AK

[nagoya1]

I agree with our PPS evaluation so far but just having assays on the properties is not the accepted valuation, mgmt needs to get a geological 43-101, the Canadian resource standard, signed off by a geologist. With this, we would know how much proven and possible resources are underground. imo
CGF

Just drilling 3 holes on a property and having those 3 assays evaluated dos not prove how much gold reserves are in the ground. Many more holes need to be drilled and assessed by a qualified geologist to determine the gold underground.

(I'm not jumping for joy when I read 1 assay contains x amount of grams per ton when only 1 hole has been drilled on a 100 acre property, if 3 feet further there is nothing, the 1 hole that was drilled shows that the resources on the land cannot be mined economically.)

I hope Guyer has the 43 101 for the properties, that would be great to know the actual amount of proven resources and then a proper money value can be attributed to it...."certainty" is better than "may'be" .imo
CGF