InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Hike

09/17/12 12:28 PM

#26839 RE: packerfanbud #26838

Read 10.77

It is the description of the HK deal with the name of the HK partner redacted pending approval of CT order (It says right in there they had filed for it).

So all this is about is that the SEC, "Yes, we agree you don't have to reveal your partners name in the 10k"

Nothing more than that.

The possibility existed in theory that the SEC could have turned down the CT order request and ELTP would have had to amend their 10k with the name of the HK partner.

What appears to have happened is the SEC said they (ELTP) had to disclose at least a little more detail, hence the amended 10k last week.