Replies to post #56261 on Global Technologies Group, Inc. (GTGP)

[TheFinalCD]

is this the same Peter J. Hurley ?

http://www.csiro.au/news/TAPM

or


http://www.zoominfo.com/people/Hurley_Peter_488134243.aspx

or

http://matrixstructural.com/whoweare/churley.html

[narnia1000]

Correct, they are using IFS, which is nothing more than a method of using the same MBS product in a wet, or dry fashion. There are multiple IFS methods.

You cannot win any ground here. Give up. This is a done deal.

[narnia1000]

How do you improve on 100% capture? lol.

EPA standard was 93%, and MBS is coming in at 98% minimum.
Game over.

[seabreezing]

Well that is interesting! However my inquiry really is more about other companies and their technology that would compete with either of these patents by this singular inventor. These 3rd party assessmenrs may not be available right now since there are no results to my knowledge any rags that review the cost results comparisons that cement companies will eventually have to cross reference to determine which of many that might come on the market over the next couple of years to deal with their specific problems . I'll take a look though

[buccaneer1961]

false info...the 2nd one isnt to be used in the usa...its licensed for european use and not in areas where this mighty fine mbs already licensed...

[buccaneer1961]

I proved to you already that so called new and improved..on the other had,the regular mbs when used with the pac removed 98% of the mecury at ashgrove...somebody forgot to tell mecury that mbs is obsolete,ha ha ha!!!!lololozzzzzzz