InvestorsHub Logo

genisi

09/02/12 9:44 AM

#148074 RE: iwfal #148068

New anticoagulants

if the switch did happen as quickly as dew believes then I would like to know what factor (cultural? Political? Budgetary? Patient preference? ...)

My guess would be the strongest factor is patient preference.

and why doctors are able to live with such drawbacks as lack of reversibility and age related issues (I know for a fact that doctors in the US are leery of precisely these issues)

Because there are many advantages and the patient is aware or being notified about the drawbacks and still requests the new anticoagulant.
(and of course these doctors are armed with very good insurance policies :-) )

iwfal

09/04/12 12:06 AM

#148135 RE: iwfal #148068

I might need to re-evaluate when the new anti-coags overtake the vit k antagonists?:

The Inquirer noted that Pradaxa exceeded all other medications in the categories of total adverse reports (3,781), deaths (542), hemorrhage (2,367), acute renal failure (291), and stroke (644). In contrast, there were only 731 reports of hemorrhage and 72 deaths associated with Coumadin

.


http://www.prweb.com/releases/pradaxa/death/prweb9585525.htm